First point of consideration is Bill which Anna thought of cannot become the law as it will violate many constitutional principles of our Country India. On what basis Anna thinks that Lokpal will not be corrupt. After all Lokpal will be a human being and point to consider is Anna cannot become Lokpal. On what basis our 'aam aadmi' was supporting Anna.
Second point of consideration is whether Anna was really fasting (without glucose). Baba Ramdev, an expert in yoga started collapsing on sixth day of his fast. Because it was Baba Ramdev's true fast (that means 'without glucose'). But still baba did not got the support the way he should have got it. 'Honesty ka koi mol nahi'. 'Baba, aaj apko samaj mein aayega ki aap glucose lekar fast karte toh aaj aapka naam bhi annaji jaisa hota. Aap bhi bahut chamakte'.
Third point of consideration Gandhian thinking and costume style wale Anna says ' One Slap is not enough on Sharad Pawar'. Well i will like to ask Anna Where is that Anna which was developing India in Ralegaon Siddhi. One Slap is not enough doesnt suits you, Anna. One Slap is not enough can create chaos in the country. Tomorrow many will get ready to follow you.
After considering all these points, Anna cannot become Prime Minister of India. He can only provoke people. He can only inspire people. But 'One slap is not enough' statement of his shows that he cannot administer people. So Anna try to administer people in a good way.